Steven Hyden's thoughtful and provocative seven-part series of articles, "The Winners' History of Rock And Roll", posits that:
In the late '60s, Led Zeppelin represented a new choice between.. "a clearly defined mass taste and a clearly defined elitist taste." This dichotomy would define the rock discourse for the next several decades, until elitist taste finally eclipsed mass taste due to audience attrition. Today, the best rock bands, almost without exception, make records with no chance of reaching the "mass taste" audience. You can blame that on changes in mass tastes — as much as "mass tastes" still exist, anyway — as well as revolutions in media and the record industry. You can also blame the bands, many of whom (intentionally or not) have sequestered themselves from the very people who used to be rock's core constituency.This has led me to think about exactly how far I've internalized the elite-taste/indie/NYC-centered vision of rock's possibilities over the last decade or so. Here, I guess, are some of the artsists I've definitely dug over the period that may fit Hyden's model of "sells out midsize theaters in large cities and elicits blank stares every place else... a group that appears to have little or no concept of what a beer-chugging, Middle American audience might want out of a rock record":
- Dirty Projectors
- LCD Soundsystem
- Bon Iver
- The National
- Sleigh Bells
- Beach House
- Passion Pit
- Arcade Fire
- The Rapture
- The Strokes
- The Shins
- The Decemberists
- Bat For Lashes
- St Vincent
- Broken Social Scene
- Joanna Newsom
- Panda Bear
- Metronomy
- M83
- Anna Calvi
- Ariel Pink's Haunted Graffiti
- Jens Lekman
- Fleet Foxes
- Life Without Buildings
- Interpol
- Swans
No comments:
Post a Comment